top of page
Search

The 9 Key Experiences That Build Future-Ready Leaders and Strengthen Leadership Development Programmes

Leadership development programmes

There is a particular kind of frustration that HR leaders know well. You have invested in your people. The leadership development programmes have run. The coaching has happened. And yet when a senior vacancy opens, when the transformation programme needs someone to step forward, when the board wants to promote from within, the pipeline feels thinner than it should. 


The talent is there. That much you know. What's missing is readiness. 


And readiness, as the research has long confirmed, doesn't come from training rooms. Research by Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger found that roughly 70 percent of what makes an effective leader comes from on-the-job experience, 20 percent from relationships and feedback, and just 10 percent from formal learning [1]. Yet most organisations still weight their development budgets heavily toward that final 10%. The result is a generation of technically excellent managers who have been trained extensively but not truly developed, people who know what good leadership looks like but haven't yet been forged by the experiences that make it possible. 


This is the gap that experience-based development is designed to close. Not through a single stretch assignment or an annual development conversation, but through a deliberate, diagnostic approach to building the breadth of experience that future-ready leadership actually requires. What follows are the nine experiences that our evidence base, drawn from work with organisations across sectors and geographies, consistently identifies as most formative, and what it means for organisations who want to design them intentionally rather than leave them to chance. 


For a practical framework and diagnostic tools to map these experiences across your leadership population, you can download the 9 Key Experiences to develop future-ready leaders handbookhttps://www.esendia.com/9-key-experiences-handbook 


Organisations looking to embed this approach systematically can explore our leadership development methodology here: https://www.esendia.com/leadership-development 

 

The Illusion of Leadership Development 


Before getting to the nine experiences themselves, it's worth naming something that most HR leaders already sense, the difference between development activity and development that actually changes someone. 


A CMI study found that leadership development drives a 32% increase in people performance and a 23% increase in organisational performance, but only when it translates into genuine capability shift, not just insight [2]. The distinction matters enormously. Insight fades. Capability, built through experience and sustained through practice, does not. An emerging leader who has been told about stakeholder management in a workshop is not the same as one who has had to navigate a politically complex special project with competing senior agendas and no formal authority. One has information. The other has judgement. 


The nine key experiences described below are the situations that build judgement. They are not mutually exclusive, and they don't all need to be major stretch assignments, some can be designed into existing roles, others accessed through secondments or project work. What matters is that they are identified, mapped against each individual's existing experience, and then deliberately provided. Intentionally. Not accidentally. 


 

1. Operational Delivery: Learning to Run Something That Matters 


Operational roles sit at the core of what an organisation actually does. They are metrics-driven, visible, and unforgiving, results are measured weekly, sometimes daily, and the leader is accountable for all of it. For many emerging leaders who have grown up in functional roles (HR, finance, legal, marketing), operational experience is the gap they don't realise they have until they reach a senior level and suddenly need it. 


What operational delivery teaches is irreplaceable, how to balance people, process, cost, and quality simultaneously. How to make business decisions rather than technical ones. How to set direction for others and hold them to it without micromanaging. These are the foundations of general management capability, and the research is consistent, leaders who lack operational experience are significantly more likely to struggle when they reach roles with enterprise-wide accountability. 


The design implication for HR leaders is one of timing. Cross-functional moves into operational roles become harder, not easier, as leaders become more senior and more specialised. If operational exposure isn't built into development pathways early, it often never happens. The window is earlier than most organisations realise. 

 

2. Unfamiliar Environment: The Learning That Only Discomfort Creates 


Moving a high-potential leader into a genuinely different function or business unit is one of the most underused development interventions available. Not a lateral move within familiar territory, but a real step change, from a support function into a frontline operational environment, from a domestic team into a global one, from a position of established expertise into one where they know almost nothing. 


The discomfort is the point. CIPD research consistently identifies cross-functional mobility as a significant predictor of leadership effectiveness at senior levels [3], and the mechanism is clear, when leaders cannot rely on technical knowledge, they are forced to develop something more durable. They learn to build credibility from scratch, to listen before they speak, to influence without authority, and to demonstrate that their skills travel. These capabilities are non-negotiable at senior levels, where the environment is almost always unfamiliar in some dimension. 


Organisations that allow talented people to spend entire careers in a single function are, without knowing it, capping the ceiling of those individuals' leadership potential. Deliberate cross-functional exposure, even in the form of a short secondment or project, begins to change that. 

 

3. People Management: The Transition Nobody Prepares For Enough 


The move from individual contributor to team leader is one of the most significant transitions in a leader's career, and one of the most poorly supported. SHRM data indicates that 60% of new managers fail within their first two years, most often because they were never helped to make the fundamental shift from doing to enabling [4]. They continue solving problems themselves rather than building teams that can solve problems without them. The result is micro-management, disengaged teams, and a ceiling on what they can ever achieve. 


People management experience needs to start early, even informally, mentoring, running a small project team, managing an intern. The habits of delegation, honest feedback, and genuine investment in others' development take years to build. They cannot be compressed into a module.

 

There is a specific risk worth naming for HR leaders, fast-track talent who move quickly through stretch roles without staying long enough to develop others. These individuals often reach senior positions having technically managed people but never truly led them. When the complexity increases and they need to deliver through a large, high-performing team, the gap becomes critical. Development pathways need to be designed with this in mind. 

 

4. Global Remit: The Experience That Changes How Leaders See Themselves 


International experience, whether through an overseas assignment or leading a cross-border team, has a quality that most other developmental experiences don't, it operates on the person, not just on their professional skills. Working in an unfamiliar culture strips away the comfort of an established network, a trusted reputation, and a clear understanding of how things get done. What remains is the individual, and how well they can genuinely adapt. 


Harvard Business Review research highlights that leaders who can operate across unfamiliar environments are significantly more effective in enterprise-level transformation roles [5].


The capabilities it develops: cultural intelligence, resilience, self-awareness, the ability to build relationships across difference, are increasingly non-negotiable in organisations that operate at any kind of scale. 


For HR leaders, equitable access to global experience matters. Personal circumstances make international assignments more accessible for some employees than others, and a development pipeline that concentrates these opportunities among a narrow demographic will, over time, narrow the pipeline itself.


Deliberate readiness assessments and alternative forms of global exposure, cross-border project teams, international task forces, help to ensure that global experience is available to those who are ready for it, regardless of circumstance. 

 

5. Change Management: Why Knowing About Change Isn't the Same as Leading It 


McKinsey research has consistently found that approximately 70% of transformation programmes fail to achieve their stated goals, and that leadership capability is one of the primary reasons [6]. Not the strategy, not the resources, not the technology. The leaders. 


This matters for how HR leaders think about change management as a development experience. There is a significant difference between a leader who has been trained in change frameworks and one who has actually stood in front of a workforce that is frightened about the future, had to maintain momentum when the initial energy has dissipated, and stayed with it long enough to see new ways of working become genuinely embedded. The second type is rare. They are also, in organisations undergoing transformation, irreplaceable. 


The design principle here is duration. HR leaders should resist moving high-potential leaders on too quickly once a change programme has stabilised. The embedding phase, slower, less visible, less energising than the launch, is precisely where the deepest leadership development happens. It is also the phase most commonly abandoned in the name of deploying talent elsewhere. 

 

6. Growth: Building Something Bigger Than You Found It 


Growth roles, responsibility for significantly expanding a team, function, market, or revenue line, develop a leadership capability that is distinct from both operational delivery and change management. They require commercial acumen, stakeholder influence, and the ability to sustain motivation in others toward ambitious, long-horizon targets. They also produce something tangible: outcomes that can be measured, pointed to, and built upon. 


For emerging leaders early in their careers, growth roles serve a dual purpose. They provide genuine stretch and a sense of ownership, while also generating the visible, quantifiable achievements that build credibility within an organisation. For HR leaders designing talent pipelines, they are a valuable middle step between early-career roles and the more complex, higher-stakes experiences that come later. 

 

7. Start-Up: What Intrapreneurship Teaches That Nothing Else Can

 

Creating something new inside an organisation, a product, a service, a team, a process, is the experience that most closely replicates the conditions of senior leadership, ambiguity, scarce resources, the need to build a coalition for an unproven idea, and the accountability for seeing it through to a working reality. Research into developmental job assignments shows that creating new initiatives is one of the most powerful forms of leadership development [7]. 


Leaders who have built something from scratch understand the texture of organisational change from the inside, which makes them significantly more effective when they later lead transformation at scale. 


The good news for HR leaders is that start-up experiences don't need to be large or high-profile. Piloting a new internal process, establishing a cross-functional working group, or launching a new internal initiative can deliver equivalent development value, provided the emerging leader is given genuine ownership, real accountability, and the opportunity to see their idea move from concept to embedded practice. 

 

8. Turnaround: Pressure as a Classroom 


There are things you can only learn when something is broken and you are the one responsible for fixing it. The discipline of diagnosing quickly without over-analysing. The courage of having difficult conversations with people who have stopped believing things can improve. The patience to rebuild trust after it has been lost. These capabilities cannot be simulated in a learning environment. They can only be developed in the real thing. 


Turnaround experience doesn't have to mean large-scale organisational rescue. Taking on the most difficult customer relationship, correcting quality problems within a team, or stepping in to lead a troubled project are all turnaround experiences at the right scale for an emerging leader. What matters, as with change management, is staying with it long enough. The stabilisation phase is where the adrenaline is. The improvement phase is where the leadership learning lives. 

 

9. Special Projects: Visibility, Strategy, and the Making of Enterprise Leaders 


Strategic, time-bound, high-visibility projects, a merger preparation, an organisational design initiative, a response to a major regulatory change, develop a leadership capability that emerges nowhere else as clearly, the ability to operate at enterprise level, across boundaries, without formal authority, on issues that genuinely matter to the organisation. 


Special projects do something else that is worth designing for deliberately. They increase an emerging leader's visibility. Senior leaders see the individual under conditions of genuine complexity and consequence. That exposure builds organisational confidence in the person, often the final prerequisite for a significant promotion, in a way that no internal advocacy or succession planning document can replicate. 


For HR leaders, special projects are most powerful when they are assigned with clear intent, combined with senior sponsorship, and followed by structured reflection. The learning needs to be named, not just accumulated. 

 

How to Add Stretch and When to Hold Back

 

Understanding which type of experience an emerging leader needs is the first design question. The second is how much stretch to build into it. Any of the nine experiences can be intensified through additional dimensions: the level of senior involvement, the degree of external or internal adversity, the breadth of responsibility, the complexity of stakeholder landscape, the sheer scale of the role relative to what the person has managed before. 


Adding stretch accelerates development. But adding too much, too fast, without adequate support, turns development into overwhelm. High challenge must be matched with high support, coaching, peer learning through action learning groups, regular check-ins, and active line manager engagement. The most impactful leadership programmes calibrate this balance deliberately, using diagnostic data to understand what each individual is ready for, rather than applying a uniform stretch level across a cohort. 


This is where the difference between a well-designed leadership programme and a generic one becomes most visible. Generic programmes treat all participants the same. Evidence-based ones treat each person as an individual, with a specific experience profile, specific gaps, and a specific development plan for closing them. 

 

Designing Intentionally: What It Asks of HR leaders 


The organisations that consistently produce strong senior leaders are not the ones with the most sophisticated competency frameworks. They are the ones that treat experience as a strategic resource, that map what experiences their emerging leaders have had, identify the gaps with diagnostic rigour, and build deliberate pathways to close them. 


This requires a genuine shift in how HR functions approach development. From event-based to sustained. From generic to personalised. From activity-focused to outcome-focused. It also requires the courage to place people into experiences before they feel entirely ready, because waiting for certainty means waiting too long, and the pipeline suffers for it. 


The nine experiences described here are not a checklist. They are a framework for thinking about what a leader needs to have navigated, at some meaningful level, before they are genuinely ready for senior responsibility. Some will be more relevant than others depending on the organisation, the role, and the individual. All of them, designed well, produce leaders who are not just capable, but ready. 

If you're building a leadership pipeline that needs to deliver in the next three to five years, the most important question isn't what training to run. It's what experiences your emerging leaders are missing, and how you're going to make sure they get them. 

 

References 


[1] Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (1996). The Career Architect Development Planner. https://johncollinscareerdevelopmentplan.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/4/0/24401899/lominger_career_architect_development_planner.pdf 

 

 

[2] Chartered Management Institute (2016). Annual Report and Accounts 2016. https://www.managers.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/CMI_Annual_Report_2016.pdf 

 

[3] Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2022). Effective Cross-Functional Collaboration in a Changing World of Work. https://www.cipd.org/en/knowledge/reports/cross-functional-collaboration/ 

 

[4] Society for Human Resource Management (2024). PMQ Mentorship Programme Overview. https://www.shrm.org/content/dam/en/shrm/enterprise-solutions/pmq-plus-professional-mentorship_one_pager.pdf 

 

[5] Carucci, R. (2016). Organizations Can’t Change If Leaders Can’t Change with Them. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/10/organizations-cant-change-if-leaders-cant-change-with-them 

 

 

[7] McCauley et al. (1994). Assessing the Developmental Components of Managerial Jobs. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229905070_Assessing_the_Developmental_Components_of_Managerial_Jobs 

 

 

 

 
 
bottom of page