top of page

Developing Leaders, Securing Succession

Know who your likely successors are, but not sure the process is transparent enough, or the development that follows is making them ready? This handbook gives you the diagnostics, frameworks, and a real case study to build leaders who are genuinely ready, not just identified. 

Get your free copy today

Get Your FREE Copy Today

✅ Trusted by HR leaders at 100+ organisations

Cover_Developing Leaders, Securing Succession.png
  • A simpler alternative to the 9-box grid you can start using immediately 
     

  • Why two leaders with identical 360 results can need completely different development 
     

  • The 5-Way Intelligence Scan: personality, 360 feedback, key experiences, performance under pressure, and career motivations 
     

  • Core development approaches: coached stretch projects, 1:1 coaching, and cohort learning 
     

  • A real case study: Noble Foods, 16 leaders, 56% promoted, 100% retention 

By submitting your information, you agree to Esendia's Privacy Policy. You can opt-out anytime.

Free Webinar

You’ve Identified Your Successors. Why Isn’t the Development Making Them Ready?

The 5-Way Intelligence Scan, diagnostic-first development, and how to design programmes that actually work

30 Sept |14 Oct
 

1-2 PM BST 

Inside this handbook

What You'll Learn

The handbook takes you from why succession pipelines fail to a practical, diagnostics-first approach for building leaders who are genuinely ready. 

 Simplify the talent framework 

Why the 9-box grid fails for 90% of the workforce, and the 4-Stage Career Model: a dynamic alternative built around Sustain, Support, Stretch, and Shift. 

1 icon.png

Move from done-to, to done-with

Why opaque, HR-run succession processes disengage the people on them, and how to make development something people drive themselves. 

Ines (8)_edited.png

Diagnose before you develop

The 5-Way Intelligence Scan: personality, 360-degree feedback, key experiences, performance under pressure, and career motivations. 

Ines (9)_edited.png

Real experience beats theory

Coached stretch projects, simulation days, and why most of what makes a leader ready happens on the job, not in a classroom. 

Ines (10).png

Individual + cohort = acceleration

Why 1:1 coaching and cohort learning each close a gap the other can’t, and how running both together gets leaders ready in 12 to 18 months. 

5 Icon

Related Resources

Continue your learning with these handpicked articles and tools from Esendia.

Blog

Why Your Succession Plan Fails When It Matters Most

The most common patterns we see in pipelines that look ready on paper, and the fixes that actually work.

Solution

Succession Planning

How Esendia works directly with organisations building succession pipelines, diagnostics-first, with results independently tracked.

Handbook

The Insider’s Guide to 360-Degree Feedback

How to get the most from the 360 degree feedback surveys. Best practice in designing, delivering and interpreting feedback surveys. 

Ready to go beyond the handbook? 

If this handbook has got you thinking about your own succession pipeline, whether it’s one critical role or your whole leadership bench, we’d love to hear about it. No agenda, just a conversation. 

FAQ

What does it mean for a leader to be “ready”, not just identified?

Being ready goes beyond being named as a successor. It means having the specific capabilities, experience, and self-awareness the next role demands, tested against real diagnostics, not assumed from a good performance review. A leader who’s been identified but never properly diagnosed can look ready on paper and still struggle when the role opens. 

Why should this be a strategic priority? 

Because the cost of getting it wrong is significant. A single transformation project delayed by six months can lose an estimated £465K in value. External hires fail at 40–50% within 18 months when the internal pipeline isn’t genuinely ready. 

What are the most common warning signs that a succession pipeline isn’t working? 

People on the succession plan who don’t know they’re on it. Development activities, a 360 here, a workshop there, never connected to an actual diagnosis. Leaders who complete a programme but still aren’t operating at the level the new role demands. 

How should development differ across career stages?

Someone in Sustain needs recognition and challenging work. Someone in Support needs coaching and realignment. Someone in Stretch needs visibility and broader experience. Someone in Shift needs acceleration through stretch assignments, our priority succession candidates. Treating all four the same is exactly what a static grid does. 

What’s the difference between identifying a successor and developing one properly? 

Identification is a judgement call, usually made once a year, about who looks ready. Development is an ongoing, diagnosed process of actually building that readiness. Most succession failures happen in the gap between the two.

bottom of page